Wednesday, November 22, 2006
The 1999 and 2000 year model Honda Civic SiR tops the list of Canada’s most stolen cars.
Consumer popularity also assures the cars will be popular with thieves. Its the second year in a row the Honda SiR has topped the list.
Rick Dubin Vice President of Investigations for the Insurance Bureau of Canada said “The Civics are easy targets.”
Dubin said that once stolen, the cars are most often sold to “chop shops” where thieves completely dismantle the vehicles. The automobile’s individual parts are worth more than the entire car.
The sheer numbers of the cars and their lack of theft deterrent systems make them thieves’ preferred choices.
1999 and 2000 Honda Civics do not come with an electronic immobilizer, however all Hondas from 2001 and onward are equipped with an immobilizer. Immobilizers will be mandatory on all new cars sold beginning September 2007. The devices enable an engine computer to recognize an electronic code in the key. If the code in the key and the engine don’t match exactly, the vehicle can’t be started.
In third place was the 2004 Subaru Impreza, while the 1999 Acura Integra came in fourth, with the 1994 Honda Civic rounding out the top five.
In sixth place, the 1998 Acura Integra, and the 1993 Dodge Shadow completed seventh.
When asked why early model vehicles are selected, he said that, “auto thieves continue to find it easier to steal older vehicles lacking an IBC-approved immobilizer. We’ve seen this trend developing for several years, and these results confirm it.”
Another Honda automobile, the 1996 year model Civic filled eighth place, with the 2000 German Audi TT Quattro in ninth.
The American 1996 Chevrolet/GMC Blazer rounded out the top ten.
None of the above cars had an electronic immobilizer.
September
5
Ingredients In Hair Care Products, The Good The Bad &Amp; The Ugly
- Click Here For More Specific Information On:
- San Diego Pharmacy Technician Training Programs
By Willie Jones
If you can read and understand what all the ingredients are in your shampoo and conditioner bottles then congratulations! You are one of a very small percentage of people who can do this. For the rest of us, we seem to go on blind faith that the manufactures know what they are doing. But what are they really? Below is a broad overview of some of the most common ingredients you’ll see on these labels.
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate:
This substance is derived from coconut alcohols. It is a surfactant which is anything that allows oil to mix with water which has a slight negative charge to it. It reduces the surface tension between it and water and is used in shampoos for normal to oily and oily hair. Other surfactants are; ammonium lauryl sulfate, ammonium laureth sulfate, sodium laureth sulfate, potassium coco hydrolyzed collagen and disodium laureth sulfosuccinate.
Isopropyl Alcohol:
This substance is derived from petroleum and is a drying agent. Isopropyl alcohol should not be left on the scalp for too along as it can start taking off the top layer of skin. This can leave the scalp susceptible infections.
Propylene Glycol Distearate:
This is crystallized stearic acid and ethylene glychol which gives your shampoo that mother of pearl look and feel. It is a common thickening agent in hair dyes and shampoos and has humidifying effects on hair and scalp.
Disodium EDTA:
This is a substance is a chelating agent that gives shampoo products a stable look and feel to it. This product, as with some of the others, must not be left on the scalp for long as it has the ability to go deep down into the skin allowing for more chemicals to potentially reach the blood stream.
Cetearyl alcohol:
Ceterayl or cetyl alcohol is made from coconut oil and is used as an emulsifier. This is what makes your hair feel like velvet. Where the glycol distearate makes the shampoo look creamy and pearl like, the cetearyl alcohol makes the hair feel silky smooth.
The Good:
These ingredients do several things. They act as a detergent for cleaning dirt, oil and debris from hair, it also provides conditioning for your hair and it is the foaming agent that makes us feel like we are really cleansing the hair and scalp. They can make your hair feel velvety soft, absorb oils or make dry hair feel moist.
The Bad:
These are all chemicals that can be absorbed into the skin and hair. Many of the chemicals in shampoo products are petroleum or alcohol based some of which are the same products used to make antifreeze or garage floor cleaners to name a few.
The Ugly:
There may be health risks associated with all of the above chemicals. They all have the potential to be absorbed into the scalp and down to the bloodstream where they can be deposited into major organs such as the brain, eyes, heart, lungs, kidney and liver where they can remain for quite some time causing damage. One needs to be especially mindful that children of all ages avoid getting these chemicals in the eyes as they may cause potential permanent damage. Skin irritation or allergic reactions can occur with prolonged use and in some cases (such as with disodium EDTA) can have carcinogenic effects on the body.
More People are getting health conscious about processed foods and are avoiding them, but how about all these chemicals? They are processed as well and although they may all stem from nature, the processing changes the chemical structure to the point where the body does not recognize what it is.
If you decide to use these ingredients, all I can suggest is that you shampoo and rinse quickly so as to avoid absorption as much as possible. Better still, Find chemical free cleansing shampoos and conditioners and avoid possible contamination altogether!
About the Author: Willie is a researcher and freelance writer whose own health problems prompted her to gain as much information on health and wellness as possible and relay it to others. She is co-owner of http://www.nutrition-tips.com a site dedicated to health and hair care products.
Source: isnare.com
Permanent Link: isnare.com/?aid=277636&ca=Wellness%2C+Fitness+and+Diet
18 December 2004
Emergency hospital during 1918 influenza epidemic, Camp Funston, Kansas (source: National Museum of Health and Medicine, AFIP).
A bout of the flu can be mild. In young, healthy adults, many infections pass unnoticed. But sometimes the influenza virus evolves into a strain that decimates its victims. The worst known strain swept the world in the Fall of 1918, infecting 500-1000 million and killing 40-100 million, about 2-5% of people.
There are several theories about where the pandemic began, but the likeliest origin was in Haskell County, Kansas, in the United States. People in the sparsely populated county, where farmers raised pigs, poultry, cattle, and grain, began suffering from influenza in late January 1918. Unusually for flu, it was young, healthy adults who were hardest hit. Victims fell ill suddenly, many progressing to pneumonia and dying, often within days. Within weeks, however, the epidemic ended. The natural geographic isolation of this community normally might have contained the fatal flu in a sort of unintentional quarantine, but the First World War intervened. Men were uprooted from their home towns and congregated in huge numbers in army camps for training and then shipping out to other camps or to fight in Europe. The destination for men from Haskell County was Camp Funston, part of Fort Riley, Kansas, where the first influenza case was reported in early March. As soldiers moved among camps, the virus spread. Within two months, the epidemic spread to most of the army camps and most of the largest cities in the United States. As American soldiers went to France, so did the virus, spreading first from the port of Brest.
The flu then spread worldwide. The pandemic reached its height in the Fall of 1918. Spain was affected early, and because Spain was not fighting in the World War, there was no wartime censorship, and news of the outbreak became widely known, leading to the flu being called the Spanish Flu in many countries. In Spain, however, it was called French Flu or the Naples Soldier. In India, about 12 million people died of flu. In some US cities, people died so quickly that morticians couldn’t cope with the bodies. According to Jessie Lee Brown Foveaux, who worked in the Fort Riley laundry during the epidemic: “They were piling them up in a warehouse until they could get coffins for them.”
The disease started with cough, then headache. Temperature, breathing and heart rate increased rapidly. In the worst cases, pneumonia came next, the lungs filling with liquid, drowning the patients and turning them blue from lack of air. Patients bled from every orifice: mouths, noses, ears, eyes. Those who survived often suffered temporary or permanent brain damage. Several million developed encephalitis lethargica, in which victims were trapped in a permanent sleeplike and rigid state, as portrayed in the 1990 movie “Awakenings.” In others, normal thought processes were impaired. During negotiations to end World War I, US President Woodrow Wilson was struck with flu, and people around him noted that his mental abilities never fully recovered. The French leader George Clemenceau had wanted harsher punishment of Germany than Wilson had desired. Clemenceau may have convinced Wilson in his weakened state to accept such harsh terms, which may have been one of the factors causing World War II.
Since flu is highly contagious early in the illness, even before symptoms appear, strict quarantine may be necessary to stop its spread during an epidemic. Australia kept its 1918 flu death rate relatively low by enforcing quarantines. However, in many parts of the world, public health officials hesitated to impose such measures, giving the disease time to gain a foothold. In the US city of Philadelphia, a rally of half a million people was planned in September 1918 to sell bonds to fund the war, at just the time when the flu started to infect residents. Although doctors warned the public health director to cancel the rally, he wanted to meet the city’s quota to raise money for the war and refused to cancel the event. Within days after the rally, half a million city residents caught the flu.
Why was the 1918 flu so deadly? The influenza virus wasn’t preserved at the time of the outbreak, at least on purpose. But in the late 1990s researchers Ann Reid, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, and their colleagues extracted and sequenced the genetic material of the virus, RNA, from tissue of victims who died in the pandemic. They used bits of lung that were preserved in formalin from victims on army bases or from victims buried in permafrost in the Alaskan village of Brevig Mission, where flu killed 85% of adults. Comparisons with known flu viruses in humans, pigs, and birds suggest that some genes of the 1918 virus came from birds or an unknown animal source. Other scientists then were able to show that the amino acid sequence of hemagglutinin protein from the 1918 virus had several changes from other flu viruses that may have helped it to easily bind and invade human cells, and that made the virus look different enough from earlier flu virus strains that people had no immunity.
The possibility exists that another flu pandemic will sweep the world like the one in 1918. In 2004, an H5N1 influenza virus has killed millions of birds and at least 30 people in southeast Asia. So far this virus strain has not evolved the ability to pass directly from human to human, but that possibility becomes more likely as the bird flu pandemic continues and humans remain in contact with chickens, ducks, and other birds. The virus has killed two-thirds of people reported to be infected. Dr. Tim Uyeki, an epidemiologist for the US Centers for Disease Control, says, “you have the ingredients in Asia right now for a public health disaster.”
But since sequences of this bird flu virus are known, it may be possible to develop a vaccine or set of vaccines to protect against it. At a special meeting of influenza experts on November 11th and 12th, World Health Organization influenza program chief Klaus Stohr said, “It is not only possible, but also important, that influenza pandemic vaccines be made available… and there’s a shared responsibility needed to make that happen…. We have a huge window of opportunity now.”